A proposed rule to increase U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) fees has been sent to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Key Points:

  • OMB review is the last step in the rulemaking process before the proposed rule is published. The text of the proposal is not yet available.
  • The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) indicated in its regulatory agenda that it is targeting September 2022 to publish the proposed rule and that it would “establish new USCIS fees to recover USCIS operating costs.”
  • Once published, the proposed fee increases will be subject to a notice-and-comment period. USCIS will be required to review all of the comments it receives before finalizing a new fee schedule.

Additional Information: In 2020, DHS published a regulation to increase filing fees, but a court blocked the fees from taking effect. The proposal under OMB review would rescind and replace the 2020 rule. USCIS funding challenges and related staffing issues have contributed to delays across visa categories, and USCIS officials have said they are prioritizing backlog reduction.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

Ed Gonzalez, President Joe Biden’s nominee to be director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), has removed himself from consideration for the post.

Key Points:

  • Biden nominated Gonzalez, the Sherriff of Harris County, Texas, more than a year ago, on April 27, 2021. The Senate never voted on his nomination.
  • Gonzalez said he reached his decision to withdraw after “considering whats best for our nation, my family, and the people of Harris County.”

Additional Information: ICE is the U.S. government’s primary immigration enforcement agency. It has not had a Senate-confirmed director since the Obama administration. The agency is currently led by acting Director Tae D. Johnson, who previously served as ICE’s deputy director. BAL will monitor White House communications for an announcement of a new nominee and will provide information as it becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

A State Department policy that allows some U.S. citizens to return to the U.S. on an expired U.S. passport is set to end June 30.

Key Points:

  • Once the policy expires, travelers will not be allowed to use expired U.S. passports to return to the U.S.
  • Until June 30, U.S. citizens currently abroad whose passports expired on or after Jan. 1, 2020, may be able to return to the U.S. using their expired passport. Certain criteria apply, and travelers are encouraged to confirm their eligibility on this website before finalizing pre-June 30 travel plans.
  • Travelers cannot use expired passports to travel from the U.S. to a foreign country or from one foreign country to another for any length of stay longer than an airport connection in route to the U.S. or a U.S. territory.

Background: The expired passport policy was adopted in May 2021. The State Department subsequently extended the policy until June 30.

BAL Analysis: The policy allowing some U.S. citizens to return the U.S. on an expired U.S. passport is set to expire June 30. Passport application processing times remain delayed, though they have improved some in recent months. Individuals in need of a renewed U.S. passport should apply for one as early as possible. Employers and employees should continue to consult their BAL professional before planning any international travel.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Office of the Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman (CIS Ombudsman) provided formal recommendations last week on how U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) should address its chronic underfunding.

USCIS is almost exclusively funded by service fees, a model that leaves the agency “consistently under-resourced.” according to the Ombudsman.  The funding problems make it “nearly impossible (for USCIS) to meet obligations and (inhibits) its ability to quickly address new and emerging circumstances”, the Ombudsman said. The Ombudsman said USCIS should seek legislative or regulatory actions to:

  • Change the agency’s biennial fee review process. The Ombudsman said this was particularly important as it relates to staffing allocation projections to make sure USCIS has enough personnel to meet processing time goals.
  • Cover the cost of delivering humanitarian-based immigration benefits through congressional appropriations. The programs covered by this type of funding would include, but not be limited to, USCIS’ refugee and asylum programs.
  • Authorize and establish a financing mechanism through the Department of the Treasury. Under this recommendation, USCIS would be able draw upon this funding source to address unexpected revenue shortfalls and unfunded policy shifts and to maintain staffing to meet performance obligations to customers and Congress.
  • Obtain annual appropriations specifically dedicated to eliminating backlogs.   
  • Resume exercising its existing authority to adjust fees annually based on the salary/inflation factor calculated by the Office of Management and Budget under Circular A-76. 

Background: USCIS has long faced funding challenges that have been exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The problem has exacerbated processing delays across many visa categories. A federal appropriations bill in March provided $275 million in funding for USCIS to address processing backlogs and delays. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is also working to publish a proposed rule to “establish new USCIS fees to recover USCIS operating costs.” While USCIS is not likely to adopt all of the Ombudsman’s recommendations, it is required to respond to the recommendations within three months. BAL will continue following USCIS’ efforts to address its funding and processing challenges and will provide updates as information becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

Companies filing H-1B cap petitions for fiscal year 2023 are reminded that the 90-day filing period closes June 30.

Key Points:

  • U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) conducted the FY 2023 H-1B lottery in late March.
  • USCIS opened the 90-day H-1B cap filing period for selected registrants on April 1.
  • Petitioners who have not yet filed a petition for candidates who were selected in the lottery must do so by June 30 in order for the petition to be considered.

Additional Information: USCIS received 483,927 registrations this year, a 56.8% increase over the 308,613 from last year. In each of the last two fiscal years, USCIS has conducted more than one lottery; however, the agency selected more registrations in the initial lottery this year and it is not clear that there will be a second lottery for FY 2023.

BAL Analysis: Companies should work with their BAL professional to ensure that their H-1B cap petitions are filed before the June 30 deadline. Employers may also wish to work with their BAL attorney to consider alternatives for registrations that were not selected in March’s lottery. BAL will continue to monitor whether USCIS will invite more registrants to submit H-1B petitions for FY 2023.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by a group of states seeking to defend the Trump-era public charge rule, leaving in place a lower court ruling that they could not intervene in the case. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will continue to enforce its pre-Trump public charge rules and pursue rulemaking to formalize longstanding policy.

Key Points:

  • In August 2019, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule to redefine the public charge ground of inadmissibility in a way that could have significantly restricted immigration to the U.S., particularly among lower income applicants.
  • The rule faced a number of lawsuits, and several courts ruled to block or vacate the rule in 2020.
  • In March 2021, the Biden administration announced it would no longer defend the rule in court. USCIS then released updated guidance confirming that applicants would no longer need to provide documentation required under the 2019 rule.
  • In February 2022, USCIS proposed a regulation that largely formalizes this guidance, in an effort to “return to the historical understanding of the term ‘public charge.
  • A group of states, led by Arizona, attempted to intervene to defend the 2019 rule. The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that it had “improvidently granted” the states’ appeal, which means the states will not be able to defend the rule.

BAL Analysis: The Supreme Court’s ruling maintains the status quo and means that USCIS will continue not enforcing the 2019 public charge rule. It is important to note that the Court did not weigh in on the legality of the Trump-era rule. In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized that the Court was not ruling on the merits and the decision has no bearing on how the Court will treat any pending or future litigation on this issue. USCIS continues to conduct public charge inadmissibility determinations consistent with its 1999 Interim Field Guidance. BAL will continue to provide updates on developments relating to the public charge ground of inadmissibility.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the U.S. State Department have announced new exemptions to ensure Afghans who would otherwise be eligible for the benefit or protection they are seeking are not automatically denied.

Adjudicating officers will apply these exemptions on a case-by-case, discretionary basis. The new exemptions may apply to the following individuals:

  • Afghans who supported U.S. military interests, specifically Afghans who fought or supported those who fought against the Taliban and those who fought against the Soviet occupation in Afghanistan.
  • Afghans employed as civil servants in Afghanistan from Sept. 27, 1996, to Dec. 22, 2001, or after Aug. 15, 2021. This group includes teachers, professors, postal workers, doctors and engineers, among others.
  • Afghans who gave insignificant or certain limited material support to a designated terrorist organization, including but not limited to cases where support was incidental or was provided in response to a reasonable threat of physical or economic harm.

Additional Information: Individuals will only qualify for the exemptions if they have undergone screening and vetting by the U.S. government and are determined to pose no risk to national security. A list of individuals who may be protected from certain automatic denials is available here.

BAL Analysis: BAL will continue to follow developments specifically affecting Afghan nationals and will provide updates on important immigration updates as information becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

Employers and immigration advocates marked the 10th anniversary of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Wednesday by urging political leaders to take action to protect the program.

The Obama administration created DACA on June 15, 2012, shielding hundreds of thousands of “Dreamers” (immigrants who were brought to the U.S. unlawfully as children) from deportation and allowing them to apply for work authorization.

“As employers and business associations committed to a strong U.S. economy, we highly value the contributions of Dreamers in our workforces and communities and reiterate the urgent need to provide them with long-term certainty and stability in the only country they know as ‘home,’” said the National Immigration Forum in a letter to congressional leaders. The letter was signed by leading U.S. employers, business associations and immigration groups, including BAL.

Despite its broad popularity and importance to employers, DACA remains under threat. In July 2021, a federal judge in Texas ruled that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not follow proper procedures when establishing the program. The Justice Department appealed the ruling, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments in the case on July 6.

White House officials, including Vice President Kamala Harris, were scheduled to meet with a group of 20 Dreamers Wednesday to discuss DACA. The Biden administration has pledged to “preserve and fortify” DACA through the regulatory process. In September, DHS published a proposed DACA regulation that drew more than 16,000 comments last fall. DHS is expected to finalize the regulation in the coming months, though litigation challenging a final regulation is likely.

DACA proponents have long said that the only permanent solution for Dreamers is legislation. Business Roundtable CEO Joshua Bolten said in a statement Wednesday that it is “long past time to enact commonsense immigration reforms” including a “permanent legislative solution for DACA recipients, who were brought here as minors and now live in limbo under the temporary DACA program.”

The Coalition for the American Dream said it is “inexcusable” that Congress has not acted to end the “legal limbo” in which DACA recipients find themselves.

“Dreamers are critical members of our workforce, industries, and communities, and they have abided by the laws and regulations of our country where they have lived almost their entire lives,” the Coalition said. “The thousands of Americans businesses represented by the Coalition for the American Dream are proud to employ many of them and we are equally proud to have watched many Dreamers start their own businesses as they contribute greatly to the American economy.”

BAL Analysis: In the 10 years since it was created, DACA has shielded hundreds of thousands of beneficiaries from deportation and allowed them to work lawfully in the U.S. DACA recipients play a key role in the American workforce, and employers have repeatedly stressed the importance of protecting the program and providing long-term relief for Dreamers. BAL continues to monitor developments related to DACA and will provide updates as information becomes available. For more information, please visit BAL’s DACA Resource Center here.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

The U.S. State Department recently published a Federal Register notice, removing the requirement that Diversity Visa entrants provide certain passport information.

Key Points:

  • Individuals submitting an electronic DV entry form are not required to provide a unique serial or issuance number associated with the principal entrant’s passport or claim an exemption to the passport requirement.
  • The final rule took effect on June 10, 2022.
  • Applicants will no longer be penalized for submitting inaccurate or incomplete passport information as it is no longer relevant to the applicant’s eligibility.
  • The full Federal Register notice is available here.

Background: In February 2022, a federal district court vacated the 2019 regulation that required DV entrants to submit valid passport information on their DV entry forms. The State Department removed the regulation to comply with the court’s ruling. Before the recent court ruling, entrants who submitted inaccurate or incomplete passport information would be automatically disqualified for that year’s DV selection.

BAL Analysis: BAL will continue to monitor changes to DV requirements and DV cases and will provide updates as information becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

Countries around the world continue to lift COVID-19 entry restrictions, and many employers and employees are planning travel abroad this summer. COVID-19 continues to affect travel to the U.S., however, and BAL urges employees to take precautions, consult their BAL professional and weigh key considerations when planning international travel.

Key Considerations:

  • COVID-19 vaccination requirement. The U.S. continues to require most nonimmigrant foreign nationals entering or returning to the country by air to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19, with limited exceptions.
    • The vaccine must be recognized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the World Health Organization (WHO).
    • A similar requirement was recently extended for those entering the country by land or ferryboat.
    • Under a change that took effect on Sunday, June 12, air passengers no longer need to provide documentation of a negative test for COVID-19 or show recovery from a recent COVID-19 infection in order to board a flight to the U.S.
  • U.S. embassy and consulate delays. The pandemic continues to limit the number of visas the State Department can process and the services available at embassies and consulates abroad. Travelers should consult the appropriate embassy or consulate’s website for the most up-to-date information regarding appointment availability and requirements for expedited requests. Officials are taking steps to address the backlog, but delays should be expected throughout the summer.
  • Administrative processing. BAL has seen a recent uptick in visa applications flagged for additional administrative processing. There are a number of reasons this may happen, including if the government wants to conduct more thorough security vetting. Administrative processing often will further delay visa applications. Employers with employees who have an administrative processing case and have a particularly urgent need to be in the country should contact BAL.
  • Passport delays. U.S. passport services continue to be delayed. Routine passport services are taking eight to 11 weeks from the date on which an application is received; expedited services are taking five to seven weeks. Those in need of a passport should apply for one as soon as possible.
  • COVID-19 restrictions in other countries. Many foreign countries are still enforcing COVID-19 travel restrictions and health protocols, including pre-travel testing requirements, screening upon arrival and, in some cases, mandatory quarantines. Many countries have different policies for vaccinated and unvaccinated travelers. Employees should be aware of their destination country’s requirements and procedures and factor additional time into their travel plans.

BAL Analysis: While many countries are lifting COVID-19 travel restrictions, the U.S. continues to enforce a vaccine requirement for inbound nonimmigrant foreign nationals. Visa and passport services continue to be delayed. Employers and employees should continue to consult their BAL professional before planning any international travel.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.