Priority-date cutoffs will advance modestly or remain the same in key employment-based categories next month, according to the Final Action Dates published in State Department’s August Visa Bulletin.

Final Action Dates: Key Movements

EB-1

  • All countries under EB-1 will remain current.

EB-2

  • China EB-2 will remain at April 1, 2019.
  • India EB-2 will remain at Dec. 1, 2014.
  • All other countries under EB-2 will remain current.

EB-3

  • China EB-3 will advance one month to April 22, 2018.
  • India EB-3 will advance one month to Feb. 15, 2012.
  • All other countries under EB-3 will remain current.

Final Action Dates for Employment-Based Preference Cases:

Preference All Other Countries China El Salvador Guatemala Honduras India Mexico Philippines
EB-1 Current Current Current Current Current Current
EB-2 Current April 1, 2019 Current Dec. 1, 2014 Current Current
EB-3 Current April 22, 2018 Current Feb. 15, 2012 Current Current

Additional Information: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) confirmed it would use the Final Action Dates chart to determine employment-based filing eligibility in August. The Dates for Filing chart will not apply.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Labor Department has posted updated processing times for permanent labor certification (PERM) applications and prevailing wage determination (PWD) requests.

PERM Processing: As of June 30, the department was adjudicating applications filed in December and earlier, conducting audit reviews on applications filed in September and earlier, and reviewing appeals for reconsideration filed in February and earlier.

Average PERM processing times:

  • Adjudication – 204 days.
  • Audit review – 279 days.

PWD Processing: As of June 30, the National Prevailing Wage Center was processing PWD requests filed in December and earlier for H-1B (OES and non-OES) and PERM (non-OES) cases and January and earlier for PERM (OES) cases, according to the Labor Department. Redeterminations were being considered on appeals filed April and earlier for H-1B cases and PERM cases. Center director reviews were being conducted for PERM cases filed in May and earlier.

BAL Analysis: BAL’s internal case tracking is consistent with the Labor Department’s published processing times. BAL is seeing approvals for PERM applications filed in December and earlier and is starting to see PWDs for requests filed in December and earlier for H-1B (OES and non-OES) and PERM (non-OES) cases and January and earlier for PERM (OES) cases.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.

 

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has submitted its final Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) regulation to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

The regulation is designed to “preserve and fortify” DACA. The text of the rule is not yet available, but OMB review is the final step in the rulemaking process before publication.

DACA Regulation Key Points:

  • DHS is targeting August to publish the final rule.
  • The agency will post the text of the regulation for public inspection at least one day before publishing it in the Federal Register.
  • The rule will likely have a 60-day delayed effective date.
  • DHS proposed the regulation in September 2021 and received more than 16,000 comments on the proposal in a two-month period last fall.

Litigation Update: DACA has been the subject of extensive litigation even as it is broadly popular and enjoys strong support from the business community.

With dozens of DACA beneficiaries in attendance, a three-judge panel with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments Wednesday in the U.S. Justice Department’s appeal of a July district court ruling that DHS did not follow proper procedures when establishing DACA in 2012. The questioning Wednesday focused largely on the Justice Department’s argument that Texas and other states lacked standing to challenge DACA.

In a separate case, a group of plaintiffs whose first-time DACA applications were pending when the July ruling was issued have asked a federal court in New York for interim relief while the Fifth Circuit litigation plays out. A hearing in the New York case is scheduled for 2:30 p.m. ET tomorrow, Thursday, July 7.

The DHS regulation was crafted in part to protect the program from legal challenges, though additional litigation is likely after the regulation is published.

BAL Analysis: The Biden administration aims to publish the final regulation to “preserve and fortify” DACA in August. For now, DHS is adjudicating only renewal applications and advance parole requests for existing DACA recipients. BAL continues to monitor developments related to DACA and will provide updates as information becomes available. For more information, please visit BAL’s DACA Resource Center here.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

Processing backlogs have generated an “avalanche” of negative consequences for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) customers and stakeholders, according to the CIS Ombudsman’s recently released 2022 Annual Report to Congress.

The report attributes the backlogs to the “perfect storm” of decreased resources, increased filings and physical limitations imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

“USCIS has frequently had to confront the impacts of its backlogs, but neither the backlogs nor their impacts have been as severe as the ones the agency currently faces,” the Ombudsman said.

The report made specific recommendations on a number of fronts, including ways USCIS could:

  • Increase flexibility in the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) renewal process.
  • Reduce barriers to travel and better manage the process of providing advance parole.
  • Improve the access to and efficiency of the expedite request process.
  • Improve the quality and efficiency of asylum adjudications without compromising integrity or fairness.
  • Optimize the agency’s digital strategy.

Background: Each year, the Ombudsman’s office conducts a substantive analysis of problems encountered by individuals and employers when seeking immigration benefits and makes recommendations for improving USCIS processes. The office released this year’s report last week and will host a webinar to discuss it on July 19 at 1 p.m. ET. The office also made formal recommendations last month on how USCIS could address its funding challenges. Those recommendations can be found here.

BAL Analysis: The COVID-19 pandemic and related funding and staffing challenges have exacerbated USCIS processing delays, and agency officials have said reducing backlogs is a top priority. The agency has added additional staff, reallocated work among offices and tried to reduce requests for evidence, among other steps, to reduce backlogs. Additionally, a proposed rule that would increase USCIS filing fees is under White House review and is targeted to be published in September. BAL will continue to monitor delays at USCIS and will provide updates on important developments.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) provided guidance this week to employment-based Adjustment of Status (AOS) applicants regarding the submission of Form I-693, Report of Medical Examination and Vaccination Record.

Key Points:

  • Applicants who are planning to file an Adjustment of Status application should generally include a valid Form I-693 (a Form I-693 is valid for two years from the date that the civil surgeon signs it).
  • Those who have a pending Form I-485, Adjustment of Status application, should not send an unsolicited Form I-693 to USCIS. USCIS will contact applicants directly if the form is needed and requests that applicants respond with the I-693 as quickly as possible once contacted.

Additional Information: More information about Form I-693 is available here. A FAQ page on employment-based Adjustment of Status is available here.

BAL Analysis: While USCIS recommends that those who are filing for adjustment of status include a valid Form I-693, officials do not recommend that those with pending applications submit the form before hearing from the agency. BAL will continue following USCIS’ guidance and will provide updates on important changes.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is holding a webinar Thursday on the “Uniting for Ukraine” program.

Key Points:

  • The webinar will be held June 30 from 2 to 3:15 p.m. EST.
  • USCIS will provide an overview of the “Uniting for Ukraine” program. Agency officials will also demonstrate the process for filing Form I-134 Declaration of Financial Support and review what a beneficiary must do in the online system to finish the application.
  • To register for the webinar, visit the USCIS public engagement page.

Additional Information: President Joe Biden announced the creation of “Uniting for Ukraine” on April 21, framing it as a key part of the U.S.’s efforts to welcome up to 100,000 individuals fleeing the Russian invasion of Ukraine. In order to participate in “Uniting for Ukraine,” Ukrainians must have a supporter in the U.S. who provides them with financial support during their time in the country, among other requirements. U.S.-based supporters must file Form I-134 with USCIS on behalf of a Ukrainian beneficiary. The government will vet applicants to ensure they can meet their financial obligations. More information is available here.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

A proposed rule to increase U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) fees has been sent to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Key Points:

  • OMB review is the last step in the rulemaking process before the proposed rule is published. The text of the proposal is not yet available.
  • The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) indicated in its regulatory agenda that it is targeting September 2022 to publish the proposed rule and that it would “establish new USCIS fees to recover USCIS operating costs.”
  • Once published, the proposed fee increases will be subject to a notice-and-comment period. USCIS will be required to review all of the comments it receives before finalizing a new fee schedule.

Additional Information: In 2020, DHS published a regulation to increase filing fees, but a court blocked the fees from taking effect. The proposal under OMB review would rescind and replace the 2020 rule. USCIS funding challenges and related staffing issues have contributed to delays across visa categories, and USCIS officials have said they are prioritizing backlog reduction.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

Ed Gonzalez, President Joe Biden’s nominee to be director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), has removed himself from consideration for the post.

Key Points:

  • Biden nominated Gonzalez, the Sherriff of Harris County, Texas, more than a year ago, on April 27, 2021. The Senate never voted on his nomination.
  • Gonzalez said he reached his decision to withdraw after “considering whats best for our nation, my family, and the people of Harris County.”

Additional Information: ICE is the U.S. government’s primary immigration enforcement agency. It has not had a Senate-confirmed director since the Obama administration. The agency is currently led by acting Director Tae D. Johnson, who previously served as ICE’s deputy director. BAL will monitor White House communications for an announcement of a new nominee and will provide information as it becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

A State Department policy that allows some U.S. citizens to return to the U.S. on an expired U.S. passport is set to end June 30.

Key Points:

  • Once the policy expires, travelers will not be allowed to use expired U.S. passports to return to the U.S.
  • Until June 30, U.S. citizens currently abroad whose passports expired on or after Jan. 1, 2020, may be able to return to the U.S. using their expired passport. Certain criteria apply, and travelers are encouraged to confirm their eligibility on this website before finalizing pre-June 30 travel plans.
  • Travelers cannot use expired passports to travel from the U.S. to a foreign country or from one foreign country to another for any length of stay longer than an airport connection in route to the U.S. or a U.S. territory.

Background: The expired passport policy was adopted in May 2021. The State Department subsequently extended the policy until June 30.

BAL Analysis: The policy allowing some U.S. citizens to return the U.S. on an expired U.S. passport is set to expire June 30. Passport application processing times remain delayed, though they have improved some in recent months. Individuals in need of a renewed U.S. passport should apply for one as early as possible. Employers and employees should continue to consult their BAL professional before planning any international travel.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Office of the Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman (CIS Ombudsman) provided formal recommendations last week on how U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) should address its chronic underfunding.

USCIS is almost exclusively funded by service fees, a model that leaves the agency “consistently under-resourced.” according to the Ombudsman.  The funding problems make it “nearly impossible (for USCIS) to meet obligations and (inhibits) its ability to quickly address new and emerging circumstances”, the Ombudsman said. The Ombudsman said USCIS should seek legislative or regulatory actions to:

  • Change the agency’s biennial fee review process. The Ombudsman said this was particularly important as it relates to staffing allocation projections to make sure USCIS has enough personnel to meet processing time goals.
  • Cover the cost of delivering humanitarian-based immigration benefits through congressional appropriations. The programs covered by this type of funding would include, but not be limited to, USCIS’ refugee and asylum programs.
  • Authorize and establish a financing mechanism through the Department of the Treasury. Under this recommendation, USCIS would be able draw upon this funding source to address unexpected revenue shortfalls and unfunded policy shifts and to maintain staffing to meet performance obligations to customers and Congress.
  • Obtain annual appropriations specifically dedicated to eliminating backlogs.   
  • Resume exercising its existing authority to adjust fees annually based on the salary/inflation factor calculated by the Office of Management and Budget under Circular A-76. 

Background: USCIS has long faced funding challenges that have been exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The problem has exacerbated processing delays across many visa categories. A federal appropriations bill in March provided $275 million in funding for USCIS to address processing backlogs and delays. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is also working to publish a proposed rule to “establish new USCIS fees to recover USCIS operating costs.” While USCIS is not likely to adopt all of the Ombudsman’s recommendations, it is required to respond to the recommendations within three months. BAL will continue following USCIS’ efforts to address its funding and processing challenges and will provide updates as information becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2022 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries, please contact copyright@bal.com.