IMPACT – HIGH

What is the change? Employers sponsoring workers in the Subclass 457 visa category will soon be given 28 calendar days to report certain status changes, such as the end of the visa worker’s employment or changes to his or her work duties. Currently, employers are only given 10 working days.

What does the change mean? The change was one of several the Australian Government said it would endorse when it announced its support for a number of recommendations an independent committee made to overhaul the 457 visa category.

  • Implementation timeframe: 18 April 2015.
  • Visas/permits affected: Subclass 457 visas.
  • Who is affected: Employers sponsoring foreign workers in the Subclass 457 visa category.
  • Business impact: The change is a positive development for business, as employers will have more time to notify authorities of changes related to employees holding 457 visas.

Background: Earlier this month, the Australian Government announced its support for a number of changes that had been recommended to overhaul the Subclass 457 visa programme. The changes include altering English-language testing requirements, changing training programmes, re-evaluating visa processing and fees and stricter penalties for abuse.

The 28-day notification period, which was recommended by the committee in 2014, provides employers sponsoring 457 visa holders more leeway and flexibility when it comes to notifying the Government of certain changes to the visa holder’s status. Changes that require notification – “notifiable events” – include the end of the visa holder’s employment, changes in work duties, payment of a visa holder’s return travel costs and, in some cases, changes in the company’s corporate structure.

BAL Analysis: The change is a positive development for 457 visa sponsors, who, up to this point, have been given a short window of time to report “notifiable events” to the authorities.

This alert has been provided by BAL Australia. For additional information, please contact australia@bal.com.

MARN: 9683856

Copyright © 2016 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

IMPACT – MEDIUM

What is the change? Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection Michaelia Cash issued a determination Friday to restore work rights to hundreds of non-Australian citizens working in the country’s offshore oil and gas industry.

What does the change mean? Cash’s move came a day after a Federal Court invalidated a previous attempt to exempt certain non-Australian workers from a law that effectively required them to obtain permanent visas in order to work on oil and gas rigs.

  • Implementation timeframe: Immediate and ongoing.
  • Visas/permits affected: The change affects a number of temporary Australian visas that allow holders to undertake specific work activities in Australia, including the Temporary Work (Skilled) subclass 457 visa and the Temporary Work (Short Stay Activity) subclass 400 visa.
  • Who is affected: Companies employing non-Australian citizens in the offshore oil and gas industry.
  • Business impact: The business stakes are high. Following the Federal Court’s decision Thursday, the Australian Mines and Metals Association (AMMA) said the AU $200 billion offshore oil and gas industry has been “thrown into uncertainty” and that the ruling jeopardised jobs for both foreign nationals and Australians working with them. Cash’s determination is intended to protect the work rights of those affected by the ruling.

Background: A three-judge Federal Court panel issued a ruling Thursday invalidating a determination Cash issued in 2014 to “except” offshore oil and gas workers from visa requirements imposed by the Labor government before the current government gained control. The Court said Cash had exceeded her authority by reversing “Parliament’s desire and intention” to require non-citizens to obtain permanent visas in order to work on offshore oil and gas rigs. Friday’s determination is designed to restore work rights to non-Australians whose status was thrown into uncertainty following the ruling. The determination will have the effect of allowing non-Australian citizens to lawfully work on offshore rigs that are fixed to the seabed.

BAL Analysis: The Court’s ruling left the status of the workers and offshore oil and gas industry in flux. The new determination, however, may restore stability. BAL will continue following the situation and update clients accordingly.

This alert has been provided by BAL Australia. For additional information, please contact australia@bal.com.

MARN: 9683856

Copyright © 2016 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

IMPACT – LOW

What is the change? Australia will add Sponsored Family Visitor Visas to its biometrics programme on 6 May.

What does the change mean? Affected applicants will have to visit an Australian Visa Application Centre or Australian Biometrics Collection Centre to have biometrics (fingerprints and facial image) taken after they submit visa applications.

  • Implementation timeframe: 6 May.
  • Visas/permits affected: Sponsored Family stream of the Visitor visa (subclass 600).
  • Who is affected: Anyone applying for a Sponsored Family Visitor Visa in a country from which Australia requires biometrics data.
  • Impact on processing times: The change will add to the time it takes to complete the visa application process for applicants in countries covered by the biometrics programme.
  • Business impact: There is no impact to business travellers; most work and business visas are already part of the biometrics programme.
  • Next steps: Sponsored Family Visitor Visa applications filed between now and 6 May do not require biometrics data. From 6 May forward, however, applicants who file Sponsored Family Visitor Visa applications from countries covered by the programme will receive correspondence from the Australian Government directing them to have biometrics taken. Applicants must take the correspondence to the closest Australian Visa Application Centre or Australian Biometrics Collection Centre to complete the process.

Background: Australia’s biometrics programme only covers designated subclasses of visas and only covers applicants from designated countries. Even after Sponsored Family Visitor Visas are added to the programme, the visa applications will continue to be lodged and processed in Australia. However, biometrics collection will be able to be completed at the closest Australian Visa Application Centres or Australian Biometrics Collection Centres abroad.

The biometrics programme covers a number of subclasses of visas in the Permanent Family, Temporary Family, Visitor and Student visa categories. The countries covered by the programme are:

Bahrain Ghana Nepal Saudi Arabia
Bangladesh Jordan Nigeria Sri Lanka
Cambodia Kenya Oman United Arab Emirates
Colombia Kuwait Pakistan Yemen
Ethiopia Lebanon Qatar Zimbabwe
France Malaysia  

Applicants filing applications from the countries above will be required to have biometrics taken regardless of nationality.

BAL Analysis: Once implemented, applicants for Sponsored Family Visitor Visas from countries covered by the biometrics programme will have to leave additional time in the visa application process in order to meet all requirements.

This alert has been provided by BAL Australia. For additional information, please contact australia@bal.com.

MARN: 9683856

Copyright © 2016 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

IMPACT – HIGH

What is the change? The Australian Government announced its support for nearly all of the changes that had been recommended to overhaul the Subclass 457 visa programme.

What does the change mean? The Government endorsed changes that touch on English-language testing, training programmes, fees, processing and efforts to crack down on abuse. The Government declined to abolish labour market testing, but officials are likely to consider ways to streamline the process.

  • Implementation timeframe: Ongoing. Some of the changes have already been implemented; others will require legislation.
  • Visas/permits affected: Subclass 457 visas.
  • Who is affected: Employers sponsoring foreign workers in the Subclass 457 visa category.
  • Impact on processing times: Some of the changes are intended to streamline processing and simplify renewal procedures.
  • Business impact: While the Government announced its intention to crack down on employers who abuse the programme, many of the changes will make the Subclass 457 process easier for responsible employers.
  • Next Steps: BAL will continue following the changes to the Subclass 457 visa category as they are rolled out in the weeks and months ahead.

Background: In September, a committee published a report recommending sweeping changes to the Subclass 457 programme. On Wednesday, the Government announced its support for a strong majority of the committee’s recommendations. The changes the Government support cover a number of areas, including:

  1. English-language requirements: The English-language requirement will be changed so that an average score of five across the four categories of the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) – speaking, reading, writing and listening – will be accepted. Currently a score of five in each category is required. A minimum score of 4.5 in each of the categories will still be mandated. The Government will also give consideration to alternative English-language test providers.
  2. Training: The Government endorsed abolishing training benchmarks and replacing them with annual training fund contributions based on the number of 457 visa holders and scaled according to the size of the sponsoring company. The funds raised will be used to train Australians for the job market.
  3. Sponsor approval: Standard business sponsors will be eligible to be approved for five years and start-up business sponsors for 18 months. Additionally, the time permitted to notify the Department of Immigration and Border Protection of a “notifiable event”, such as the end of a 457 visa holder’s employment, will be extended to 28 days. Currently, only 10 days are permitted.
  4. Fees: Fees structures will be reviewed, particularly for secondary visa and visa renewal applicants.
  5. Processing: The Government will consider a streamlined processing system. Changes to processing would take into account “risk factors”, including business size, occupation, salary and past “sponsor behaviour”.
  6. Eligibility for other programmes: Subclass 457 visa holders will be required to work for a minimum of two years in Australia before being eligible for the Employer Nomination Scheme or Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme. The Government will also review the age restriction on 457 holders transitioning to either of these two schemes.
  7. Information sharing: The Department of Immigration and Border Protection and the Australian Taxation Office will share more information to monitor the 457 programme. Subclass 457 visa holders will be required to provide the Department of Immigration and Border Protection their Australian tax file number.
  8. Programme abuse: Sponsors will be barred from accepting payments made by visa applicants for purposes of securing a “migration outcome”. Violating this rule will result in “robust” penalties for offenders.

The only recommendation the Government rejected was one to consider expanding the list of countries whose nationals are not subject to English-language testing. The Government took note of, but did not explicitly support, a recommendation to abolish employer-conducted labour market testing. The Government is likely to consider ways to reduce the red tape involved in the current labour market testing process, however.

BAL Analysis: Overall, the Government’s support for a number of changes to the 457 scheme is welcome news to employers who participate in the programme. The changes are designed to make it easier for employers to find high-skilled foreign employees, while simultaneously cracking down on employers who abuse the programme.

Options for residency could be limited by the requirement that subclass 457 visa holders work for a minimum of two years in Australia before being eligible for the Employer Nomination Scheme or Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme. The change, when implemented, will have a negative impact on some foreign nationals.

This alert has been provided by BAL Australia. For additional information, please contact australia@bal.com.

MARN: 9683856

Copyright © 2016 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

IMPACT – LOW

What is the change? Australia will increase the number of Seasonal Worker Program visas it makes available in the 2015-16 fiscal year. The number will increase from 3,250 to 4,250.

What does the change mean? Farmers and other employers will be able to employ more foreign workers from the Pacific and Timor-Leste.

  • Implementation timeframe: 1 July.
  • Visas/permits affected: Special Program visa (subclass 416).
  • Who is affected: Farmers and others employing workers through the Seasonal Worker Program.
  • Business impact: The changes will allow farmers and other employers to hire more foreign nationals.
  • Next Steps: The additional permits will be available 1July, the beginning of the Australian fiscal year.

Background: The Seasonal Worker Program allows guest workers to come to Australia from the Pacific or Timor-Leste for up to six months for seasonal jobs in agriculture and a limited number of other industries. In the past, the program was hindered by labour market testing requirements and labour caps on specific areas of agriculture, such as horticulture, sugarcane and cotton farming. The sector-specific caps have been lifted, however, and now the overall cap is set to increase as well. The program is available to nationals of Kiribati, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu.

BAL Analysis: The changes to the Seasonal Worker Program, including eliminating caps on specific areas of farming and increasing the overall cap, should help farmers and other Australian employers meet their business needs.

This alert has been provided by BAL Australia. For additional information, please contact australia@bal.com.

MARN: 9683856

Copyright © 2016 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

IMPACT – MEDIUM

What is the change? U.S. citizens and permanent residents needing an FBI clearance for an Australian visa can now use select FBI-approved channelers to obtain clearance.

What does the change mean? The change could save significant time in the visa-application process.

  • Implementation timeframe: Immediate and ongoing. 
  • Visas/permits affected: Any visas for which FBI clearance is required. 
  • Who is affected: U.S. citizen and permanent residents who require FBI clearance to obtain an Australian visa.
  • Impact on processing times: The FBI’s current processing time for issuance of clearance is approximately 12 to 14 weeks. FBI-approved channelers are able to issue clearance significantly faster.
  • Next Steps: U.S. citizens and permanent residents can now use the following FBI-approved channelers when obtaining FBI clearance for purposes of visa processing: National Background Check, IncNational Credit Reporting and Telos Identity Management Solutions, LLC.

Background: Foreign nationals often need police clearances in order to obtain certain subclasses of Australian visas. When police clearances are required as part of the visa application process, foreign nationals need to obtain the relevant clearances for those countries they have lived in for at least 12 months in the past 10 years.

Australia’s Department of Immigration and Border Protection recently began accepting clearances from the three FBI-approved channelers, who are able to expedite the process by submitting the applicant’s information to the FBI and obtaining the clearance from the FBI. In some cases non-U.S. nationals who have lived in the U.S. will require FBI clearance for an Australian visa. However, FBI-approved channelers are only permitted to process requests from U.S. citizens and permanent residents.

BAL Analysis: Using an FBI-approved channeler could significantly reduce the time it takes to receive necessary FBI clearance when applying for a visa. Visa applicants should contact their local BAL attorney if they have any questions about the process.

This alert has been provided by BAL Australia. For additional information, please contact australia@bal.com.

MARN: 9683856

Copyright © 2016 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

IMPACT – MEDIUM

What is the change? Australian authorities raided the offices of a major mining and infrastructure firm this week, suspecting widespread visa fraud.

What does the change mean? The raids are the latest sign that the Australian Government is growing increasingly serious about Subclass 457 sponsorship violations. Employers should be vigilant to ensure they are in compliance with all 457 sponsorship requirements.

  • Implementation timeframe: Immediate and ongoing.
  • Visas/permits affected: Subclass 457 visas.
  • Who is affected: Employers sponsoring 457 visa holders.
  • Business impact: Businesses sponsoring 457 employees should take notice of the recent enforcement efforts.

Background: Officials raided the offices of Murphy Pipe and Civil, which authorities suspect helped dozens of foreign workers fraudulently obtain 457 visas. BAL reported last week that Australia has seen a string of cases involving employers alleged to have violated 457 sponsorship requirements. In Melbourne, a popular restaurant lost its right to recruit foreign workers for five years after being cited for 457 sponsorship violations. In Sydney, a restaurant and its owner faced penalties after being found to have underpaid a South Korean cook by more than A$50 000 over a 13-month period. And work at Manildra Group’s ethanol plant in Bomaderry was stopped last week after labour union leaders alleged incidents of Subclass 457 visa abuse.

BAL Analysis: The recent focus on Subclass 457 violations is a reminder of the importance of complying with visa guidelines. Penalties can be harsh and may include fines and sanctions. Contact a BAL Registered Migration Agent about taking the necessary measures to stay in compliance with Subclass 457 requirements.

This alert has been provided by BAL Australia. For additional information, please contact australia@bal.com.

MARN: 9683856

Copyright © 2016 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

IMPACT – HIGH

What is the change? A popular restaurant in Melbourne has lost its right to recruit foreign workers for five years after being cited for a number of Subclass 457 sponsorship violations. The incident is one in a string of cases where employers have landed themselves in trouble for 457 sponsorship violations – and the Australian Government has signalled it is getting more serious about 457 sponsorship infractions.

What does the change mean? Employers should be vigilant to ensure that they are in compliance with all 457 sponsorship requirements.

  • Implementation timeframe: Immediate and ongoing.
  • Visas/permits affected: Subclass 457 visas.
  • Who is affected: Employers sponsoring 457 visa holders.
  • Impact on processing times: No impact.
  • Business impact: Businesses sponsoring 457 employees should take notice of the recent enforcement efforts.
  • Next steps: Employers should make sure that they are following all 457 sponsorship requirements in order to avoid penalties for noncompliance.

Background: Australia’s Subclass 457 visa allows skilled workers to enter and work in Australia for up to four years. Employers participating in the 457 programme must meet a number of requirements, including minimum salary and labour market testing, and satisfy industrial relations regulations.

On 27 January, Australian officials announced that an Indian restaurant in Melbourne had lost its right to sponsor Subclass 457 visas and would be ineligible to recruit foreign workers under the programme for five years. Over time, the restaurant had underpaid employees, failed to keep proper records and provided false or misleading information, according to a statement from Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection Michaelia Cash.

The statement said the number of employers sanctioned for 457 violations rose 68 per cent in the 2013-14 fiscal year, which ended 30 June 2014. The Department of Immigration and Border Protection “is constantly monitoring 457 sponsors to ensure they are operating appropriately,” Cash said in the statement. “Businesses acting in good faith have nothing to fear, but we want to send a strong message that if you breach your obligations, you can expect to face the consequences, including fines and cancellation of your sponsorship.”

The Melbourne case is not the only one of its kind. A Sydney restaurant was recently found to have underpaid a South Korean cook by more than A$50 000. The restaurant agreed to pay all outstanding wages, provide a written apology, publicize its “sincere regret” in a local newspaper, and donate A$1000 to the NSW Working Women’s Centre toward education of workplace obligations and rights.

In another case, work at Manildra Group’s Ethanol Plant in Bomaderry was stopped last week after labour union leaders alleged incidents of Subclass 457 visa abuse. Another employer is facing legal action over allegations that he paid an employee on a 417 visa less than A$2 an hour for her work in Tasmania.

BAL Analysis: The Australian Government’s recent focus on Subclass 457 and other visa violations is a reminder of the importance of complying with all visa guidelines. Penalties can be harsh and may include fines and sanctions. Contact a BAL Migration Agent if you have any questions about staying in compliance with Subclass 457 or other visa requirements.

This alert has been provided by BAL Australia. For additional information, please contact australia@bal.com.

MARN: 9683856

Copyright © 2016 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

IMPACT – MEDIUM

What is the change? The Japan-Australia Economic Partnership Agreement will go into effect 15 January.

What does the change mean? Business visitors, intra-corporate transferees, contractual service providers, and investors who are nationals of Australia or Japan will have greater access to each other’s countries. JAEPA will also end labour market testing in Australia for Japanese nationals, permanent residents or employees transferring to an Australian branch of a Japanese company that is being nominated under the 457 programme.

  • Implementation timeframe: 15 January.
  • Visas/permits affected: Subclass 457 visas, business visas, investment visas
  • Who is affected: Australian and Japanese companies and employees doing business or working in each other’s countries. The agreement also affects employees’ dependants.
  • Impact on processing times: JAEPA is expected to reduce wait times by easing access to Australia and Japan for nationals of either country.
  • Business impact: The agreement is designed to strengthen economic ties between the two countries and lift barriers to entry for business people, investors and their families.
  • Next steps: JAEPA takes effect 15 January.

Background: Australian and Japanese government officials “exchanged notes” in December, signifying that all domestic processes related to the economic agreement had been completed and setting the stage for the agreement to go into effect.

JAEPA follows the implementation of a Korea-Australia Free Trade Agreement in December. Australia has also completed negotiations with China on a free trade agreement between those two countries. JAEPA includes specific commitments for Australia and Japan related to the movement of natural persons.

Australia’s commitments include providing stays of up to 90 days for Japanese business visitors, six months for Japanese service sellers, up to four years for Japanese intra-corporate transferee executives or senior managers, up to two years for Japanese intra-corporate transferee professionals or trade specialists, up to one year for Japanese contractual service suppliers, and up to two years for Japanese investors. Australia is also required to provide the right of entry, stay and work for spouses and dependants of Japanese business people or investors for a period of time equal to that of the business person or investor’s stay.

The agreement ends labour market testing for Japanese nationals, permanent residents and employees transferring to an Australian branch of a Japanese company that is nominated under Australia’s 457 programme.

Japan’s specific commitments include providing stays of up to 90 days for short-term Australian business visitors; and stays of one or three years for Australian intra-corporate transferees, Australian professional service providers, Australian nationals engaging in business activities requiring advanced or technological knowledge, and Australian investors.

Japan is also required to provide the right of entry and stay and work for spouses and dependants of Australian business people or investors. Spouses who have been granted entry and temporary stay under the agreement can have their residence status changed so that they are permitted to work, subject to the approval of the Japanese government.

BAL Analysis: JAEPA represents an easing of barriers to entry across almost all categories of business visitors, workers and investors in both Australia and Japan. The end of labour market testing in the 457 programme will make it easier for Australian employers to hire skilled workers from Japan. The agreement should have the additional benefit of easing wait times for visa and permit processing for nationals of both countries.

This alert has been provided by BAL Australia. For additional information, please contact australia@bal.com.

MARN: 9683856

Copyright © 2016 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

IMPACT – HIGH

What is the change? Australia’s Department of Immigration and Border Protection has proposed a new visa category that would allow high-skilled foreign nationals to work in Australia for up to one year. Berry Appleman & Leiden has been advocating for an appropriate short-term work visa for some time, and the proposal is a welcome development.

What does the change mean? Qualifying applicants would be able to apply for the new one-year visas, rather than go through the costly and time-consuming process of applying for Subclass 457 visas.

  • Implementation timeframe: The Department of Immigration and Border Protection proposed the one-year visa in December 2014, as part of a review of Australia’s overall skilled migrant scheme. Submissions to the review are due at the end of January 2015. The Australian Government will then make a decision on whether to move forward with the recommendation.
  • Visas/permits affected: The proposal would create a new one-year short-term mobility visa for high-skilled foreign nationals.
  • Who is affected: Employers aiming to hire high-skilled foreign nationals for up to one year.
  • Impact on processing times: Most people anticipate that there would be marked improvements in processing times for the new visa when compared to the 457 visa.
  • Business impact: Businesses would save time and money because the new visa’s application would likely be significantly less costly and time-consuming. The new visa would not require the labour market testing, language or skill requirements that the 457 requires.
  • Next steps: At the end of the submission period, the Australian Government will decide whether to move forward with the proposal. BAL is providing a submission in support of the proposed new short-term mobility

Background: A new visa would be welcome news to Australian employers, many of whom have complained about the difficulty of the 457 visa application process. The proposal has come under fire from labour unions, which say a one-year visa for foreign nationals would damage Australia’s domestic labour market. Proponents say that’s not the case and that the visa will help make Australia competitive in the global economy.

Douglas Allison, BAL Sydney’s Client Manager and Solicitor, was quoted on 8 January in the Australian Financial Review saying the proposed visa would be welcomed by businesses, which wanted to be able to make intra-company transfers and short-term appointments quickly and simply. In the article, Allison also advocated BAL’s preferred position to remove the current age threshold of 50 for skilled permanent residence. He commented that “to suggest that skilled persons over the age of 50, if they were to permanently migrate to Australia, are not able to provide a sufficient contribution to society and create a benefit to members of the Australian community, is misconstrued and borders on the adoption of discriminatory practices.”

BAL Analysis: A one-year short-term mobility visa would be a significant benefit to Australian employers looking to stay competitive in the global economy. BAL Australia’s Managing Director, Tim Denney, stated that in “today’s modern economy it is imperative that businesses operating in Australia and across the globe have the flexibility to move highly skilled employees quickly and efficiently across borders for short-term assignments. A visa such as the proposed short-term mobility visa would assist the Australian economy to remain completive and assist to create economic growth.” BAL Australia will continue to monitor the process and will keep clients updated on key developments.

This alert has been provided by BAL Australia. For additional information, please contact australia@bal.com.

MARN: 9683856

Copyright © 2016 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.