Priority cutoff dates will advance modestly across EB-2 and EB-3 categories, according to the State Department’s March Visa Bulletin.

Key movements in cutoff dates: 

  • China EB-2 will advance by two months and one week to Dec. 8, 2013, while China EB-3 will advance by two months to Nov. 15, 2014.
  • India EB-2 will advance one week to Dec. 15, 2008, while India EB-3 will advance by one month to Jan. 1, 2007.
  • Philippines EB-3 will advance by two months to May 1, 2016.

Additional notes: All EB-1 categories will remain current, as will all EB-2 categories other than China and India. The EB-3 categories for El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, Mexico and All Other Chargeability Areas will also remain current.

Application Final Action Dates for Employment-Based Preference Cases:

Preference China El Salvador Guatemala Honduras India Mexico Philippines All Other Countries
EB-1 Current Current Current Current Current Current
EB-2 Dec. 8, 2013 Current Dec. 15, 2008 Current Current Current
EB-3 Nov. 15, 2014 Current Jan. 1, 2007 Current May 1, 2016 Current

The State Department also released its Dates for Filing chart for March 2018. Applicants seeking to file for adjustment of status are reminded that the chart does not take effect unless U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services confirms that it does via a web posting in the coming days. BAL will update clients once the State Department confirms whether the chart can be used in January.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2018 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Labor Department has posted processing times current as of Jan. 31 for permanent labor certification (PERM) applications and prevailing wage determination (PWD) requests.

PERM processing: Applications filed in August and earlier are now being adjudicated, according to the department. Audit reviews are being conducted on applications filed in June and earlier, and appeals filed in December and earlier are being reviewed for reconsideration.

Average PERM processing times in January:

  • Adjudication – 152 days.
  • Audit review – 251 days.

PWD processing: The National Prevailing Wage Center is currently processing requests filed in November and earlier for both H-1B and PERM cases. Redeterminations are being considered on appeals filed in December and earlier for H-1B and PERM cases. Center director reviews are being conducted on appeals filed in December for PERM cases. The department reported that it had no center director reviews pending for H-1B cases as of Jan. 31.

Average times for issuance of prevailing wage determinations in January:

  • H-1B – 74 days (OES), 77 days (non-OES).
  • PERM – 73 days (OES), 81 days (non-OES).

The Labor Department reports PERM and PWD processing timeframes on its iCERT page.

BAL Analysis: BAL’s internal case tracking is mostly consistent with the Labor Department processing times. BAL is seeing approvals for PERM applications filed in early September and is awaiting PWDs for requests filed in November and earlier.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2018 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

President Donald Trump signed a national security memorandum Tuesday to establish a National Vetting Center. The center will be charged with developing more comprehensive vetting standards for those looking to immigrate or travel to the United States. Trump’s memo gave the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) six months to develop an implementation plan to make the vetting center operational.

Key Points:

  • DHS will lead the effort to create the National Vetting Center and will be tasked with improving inter-agency cooperation and use of intelligence when vetting foreign nationals immigrating or traveling to the United States.
  • Trump has repeatedly called for “extreme vetting” of foreign nationals coming to the United States, and the establishment of the vetting center is the most recent example of this policy. The administration has already rolled out a new set of questions for visa applicants subject to additional screening and begun requiring employment-based visa holders applying for lawful permanent residence to attend an in-person interview.

BAL Analysis: Tuesday’s announcement focused solely on the creation of a new, centralized center for security screening and no mention was made of any changes to screening standards or criteria. It is too early to know whether the creation of the center will lead to lengthier screening processes for visa applicants or others traveling to the United States. More will be known about what impact the center may have once DHS puts together its implementation plan, which it will be required to do in the next six months. BAL will alert clients once additional information about how the center will operate becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2018 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

Two new digital features introduced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection are intended to encourage compliance by foreign nationals traveling to the U.S. on the Visa Waiver Program and prevent them from overstaying.

Key points:

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection will now send email reminders to travelers in the U.S. on the Visa Waiver Program 10 days before expiration of their period of lawful admission (I-94). The email will be sent from the email address: Staycompliance-donotreply@cbp.dhs.gov.
  • Additionally, travelers may check the number of their remaining days on the I-94 website under the “View Compliance” tab by entering their name and passport information.

Background: The Visa Waiver Program allows nationals of 38 participating countries to travel to the U.S. for up to 90 days for business or tourism without needing to obtain a visa at a U.S. Consulate before travel. Travelers must register and obtain an Electronic System Travel Authorization (ESTA) before boarding a flight.

BAL Analysis: Individuals traveling to the U.S. on the Visa Waiver Program may use the date-calculation tool on the I-94 website and should expect to receive a reminder email 10 days before their lawful stay will expire. U.S. CBP is also warning travelers to watch out for phishing or other email scams from senders other than the official email address.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2018 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

After Attorney General Jeff Sessions made a determination that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was an “unconstitutional exercise of authority by the Executive Branch,” the Department of Homeland Security announced that it would stop renewing DACA applications that expire on or after March 6. With less than 25 business days until the program ends and no clear path for legislative relief for DACA beneficiaries, companies should begin preparing for the increasingly likely outcome that they will need to terminate key employees in the weeks and months ahead. BAL has drafted an FAQ that addresses when the program is scheduled to end, what steps companies employing DACA employees should take in the coming weeks and the possibility that Congress might pass DACA legislation. The full FAQ is available here.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2018 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has confirmed important details about the upcoming H-1B cap season, in light of concerns that proposed changes to H-1B visas by the Trump administration could affect the filing season, which begins April 2. The agency’s Service Center Operations Directorate provided the information to the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

Key points:

  • Procedures will remain the same as last season. This means that there will be no preregistration system and if the number of petitions exceeds the numerical caps, a lottery will determine which petitions are selected for processing.
  • The agency is likely to impose a “short” suspension of premium processing services for H-1B cap-subject petitions.
  • Premium processing is not expected to be suspended for non-cap H-1B petitions.

Background: In December, the Department of Homeland Security released its 2018 regulatory agenda, which included changes in how H-1B cap petitions are selected, such as an electronic preregistration system. Other agenda items include changes to the definition of “specialty occupation,” qualifying criteria and minimum salaries paid to H-1B employees in order to protect American workers.

BAL Analysis: Employers should expect a lottery selection process similar to those in previous cap seasons. Businesses should assume that premium processing will not be available for H-1B cap-subject petitions at the start of filing season and factor that into their schedules. Although it is not clear how long the suspension will last, it will presumably be shorter than the six-month suspension last year. Unlike last season, premium processing for non-cap H-1B cases will not be interrupted. BAL is closely following any changes to H-1B cap season and will report any developments, including regulatory proposals that could affect how petitions are adjudicated this summer.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2018 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

President Donald Trump released an outline of an immigration plan Thursday that would provide a pathway to citizenship for as many as 1.8 million undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children in exchange for a handful of hard-line measures, including funding for a border wall and changes to family-based immigration.

The Trump framework would:

  • Protect the Dreamers. The White House called for providing legal status for those who enrolled in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program as well as for those who were eligible but never enrolled. The legal status would include a 10- to 12-year path to citizenship “with requirements for work, education and good moral character.”
  • Fund a border wall. The White House called for a number of measures to increase security along the border, including the establishment of a $25 billion “trust fund” for a “border wall system” and other “border improvements and enhancements.”
  • Reduce family-based Immigration. The White House called for limiting family sponsorship solely to spouses and minor children for both U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (green card holders).
  • End the Diversity Visa program. The White House again called for ending the Diversity Visa program, also called the green card lottery, which is designed to provide immigration opportunities to people from countries with historically low levels of immigration to the U.S. The proposal would reallocate the visas from this program to other categories in order to reduce green card backlogs for both family- and employment-based green card applicants.

BAL Analysis: While Trump’s framework for the ongoing immigration negotiations provides a glimpse of where the White House stands on some key issues, it only offers hints at what final legislation might look like. The changes to family migration in particular would mark a dramatic change to the country’s legal immigration system. BAL will continue following the immigration negotiations and will provide clients with updates as more information becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2018 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch has introduced his latest version of the Immigration Innovation Act or “I-Squared.” The legislation would increase the number of H-1B visas available annually, eliminate the green card backlog for most employment-based immigrants and add new attestation and enforcement mechanisms to the H-1B program. Hatch introduced similar legislation in 2013 and 2015.

The 2018 version of I-Squared would:

  • Raise the annual H-1B cap from 65,000 to 85,000 and institute an “escalator clause” that would enable the issuance of up to 195,000 visas based on H-1B demand.
  • Eliminate the green card backlog by lifting per-country limits and allowing unused green cards from previous years to be reissued.
  • Authorize spouses of H-1B visa holders (H-4) to work if the H-1B holder has a pending or approved labor certification or immigrant petition.
  • Permit “dual intent” for foreign students so that employers can start the green card process while the student is still in school or working pursuant to Optional Practical Training.
  • Allow employees who have an approved labor certification or immigrant petition to change jobs or employers without losing their place in line for a green card.
  • Increase H-1B and green card application fees to fund education and training programs for U.S. STEM students and workers.
  • Provide a 60-day period for H-1B workers who lose their job to obtain H-1B status through another employer.

BAL has prepared a one-page summary and an analysis of the I-Squared bill.

BAL Analysis: Business coalitions have expressed support for the bill and view it as a positive development for high-skilled immigration. BAL is working closely with the legislators sponsoring this bill and is monitoring all legislative developments in Congress. BAL will continue to provide updates as additional information becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2018 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

The federal government shutdown ended Monday after the U.S. Senate agreed to a short-term extension of the debt limit through Feb. 8. Parties reached agreement after agreeing to tackle immigration legislation in the weeks ahead.

Legislative landscape: Deep policy differences remain

Neither the House nor the Senate has passed immigration addressing the status of Dreamers, and the bases of both parties remain far apart. The primary legislative vehicle for Republicans in the House is Rep. Bob Goodlatte’s (R-Va.) Securing America’s Future Act (H.R.4760), while Democrats in the Senate have rallied behind the bipartisan “Gang of 6” proposal. Within the next 17 days, both chambers of Congress will need to resolve stark policy differences or set those issues to the side. For example:

  • The Gang of 6 seeks a 12-year path to citizenship for Dreamers, while the Goodlatte bill offers no path to a green card or citizenship.
  • The Gang of 6 proposes $2.7 billion in border wall funding, while the Goodlatte bill seeks $100 billion in funding over four years.
  • The Gang of 6 seeks minor changes in legal immigration, while the Goodlatte bill would result in the most significant reduction in family-based immigration in a century.
  • The Gang of 6 would not alter the current immigration enforcement landscape, while the Goodlatte bill would render all unlawful immigrants criminals, which would then subject them to detention by any state or local official following arrest.
  • Behind the scenes, Senate and House leadership continues to discuss opportunities for common ground. Whether those discussions can lead to a political breakthrough is unknown.

Dramatic reductions in legal immigration: Likely outcome or bargaining chip?

A key sticking point in negotiations is whether relief for Dreamers should be packaged with changes to the legal immigration system. The White House and Republicans in both the Senate and the House are seeking significant reductions in family-based immigration levels, which they often refer to as “chain migration.” Those proposals are not minor tweaks. If enacted, those proposals would constitute the most significant reduction in legal immigration in a century. Goodlatte’s bill would reduce overall legal immigration levels by approximately 45 percent, and family-based immigration would drop by approximately 62 percent. A full analysis of the Goodlatte bill is available here.

Though advocates for reduced immigration levels are well funded and have extensive influence on immigration policy, it is unclear whether that issue will become part of any Dreamer compromise.

BAL Analysis: The short-term extension does not resolve the pressing question: Will the immigration legislative debate evolve into a kitchen soup “comprehensive” debate or will the parties agree to scale it back to a discussion over relief for Dreamers, border security and tweaks to the system? President Donald Trump remains the wild card in the debate, as both parties believe that his support can be secured. BAL is working with business coalitions and will keep clients apprised of developments. For questions or inquiries regarding the analyses, please contact BALgov@bal.com.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group.

Copyright © 2018 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Supreme Court said Friday that it will rule on legal challenges to the latest version of President Donald Trump’s travel ban. Oral arguments are set for April and a ruling is expected before the end of the Court’s term in June.

Key points:

  • The Court will review a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that found Trump exceeded his authority in issuing the travel ban. A separate ruling from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, on an appeal of a ruling by a Maryland district court, is expected any day, and that case could be added to the Supreme Court review. While the 9th Circuit decision was based on issues relating to the statutory authority of the president and did not address the constitutional concerns that were the focus of the Maryland Court, the Supreme Court asked for briefings on both statutory and constitutional claims challenging the travel ban.
  • The ban has been in full effect since December when the Supreme Court lifted injunctions put in place by courts in Hawaii and Maryland, saying the ban could be implemented while litigation challenging them played out in the courts. The travel ban applies to nationals of Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen and the restrictions are specific to each country.

Background: The latest version of Trump’s travel ban was issued in September after two earlier versions were met with resistance in the courts. The third version applied to more countries, but was also more carefully crafted to withstand judicial scrutiny. The Court is now set to rule on the merits of the legal challenges, including whether the president had the legal authority under the Immigration and Naturalization Act to issue the ban and whether it represents a violation of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause.

BAL Analysis: The Court has the opportunity to settle some of the legal questions that have surrounded the travel ban and its earlier iterations for almost a year. The Court’s previous order allowing the travel ban to remain in place pending appeal indicates that the Court may be inclined to support this version of the ban, but the Circuit Court opinions, which had not yet been considered by the Court, may influence the justices’ final decision.

The current version of the ban has not dramatically expanded the number of employees subject to travel restrictions for most companies. BAL released an FAQ on the restrictions when they were released in September. The analysis is available here.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2018 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.