The State Department posted two updates regarding the ongoing travel bans that suspend entry of immigrants and certain work-visa applicants.

Diversity visas. The agency will begin issuing immigrant visas to winners of the DV-2020 lottery, in compliance with a court order requiring the government to issue the visas by Sept. 30.

  • The State Department’s announcement lists how it will prioritize visa issuance to different groups of applicants.
  • Applicants who held valid diversity visas on April 23 (when the immigrant visa travel ban took effect) that have since expired may be reissued a visa before Sept. 30.
  • Applicants who were previously scheduled for an interview should contact the U.S. consulate for further information.
  • The State Department said it will not be able to issue all DV-2020 visas by the deadline. This means there may be individuals who are not issued visas and will lose eligibility to obtain a diversity visa. Additional information and instructions are available in the State Department notice.

J-1 national interest exceptions. The State Department also posted FAQs regarding J-1 visa applicants who may be eligible for a national interest exception to the work-visa travel ban, including:

  • Applicants in an exchange program under a qualifying agreement between a foreign government and the U.S. government and is designed to promote U.S. national interests.
  • Interns and trainees hosted by a U.S. government agency program that supports the U.S. economic recovery.
  • Certain specialized teachers who are teaching full-time and primarily in-person at an accredited institution.
  • J-1 visitors in an exchange program fulfilling “critical and time sensitive” foreign policy objectives.

BAL Analysis: Visa applicants are reminded that multiple travel bans remain in place and many U.S. consulates are only accepting emergency appointment requests at this time, during the phased resumption of visa services. The State Department stated that it may reschedule interviews for applicants in other visa categories in order to prioritize DV applicants. Those who are issued diversity visas remain barred from entering the U.S. under the immigrant-visa ban, unless they qualify for an exemption. They may, however, enter the U.S. if the ban expires during the diversity visa’s validity period, typically six months. BAL is closely following the multiple lawsuits challenging the travel bans, and will report additional information as it becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Department of Labor (DOL) has sent a rule that will amend wage levels for H-1B and permanent labor certifications (PERM) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. The text of the rule is not yet available.

Key points:

  • OMB review is the last step in the rulemaking process before publication. The text of the rule will be posted for public inspection at least a day before its official publication in the Federal Register.
  • The rule is an Interim Final Rule (IFR), which means that the agency finds “for good cause” that a comment period would be “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” The government may also argue that good cause exists to make the regulation effective upon publication or soon after.
  • The rule, entitled “Restructuring of H-1B/H-1B1/E-3 and PERM Wage Levels” has never been published in a regulatory agenda, and no description from the government is available.

BAL Analysis: The Department of Homeland Security’s IFR, which will alter H-1B eligibility requirements, is also currently under OMB review. The text of both rules will be posted for public inspection in the coming weeks. It is not yet known whether the agencies will issue these rules with delayed effective dates. Though the agencies will likely argue that they do not need to consider public comments before making the rules effective, members of the public may still comment on an IFR. Litigation is expected, though it is too early to predict the likelihood of success. BAL is closely monitoring the progress of these rules and will report additional information on their potential impact when the text is available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

 

 

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has proposed a regulation that would significantly expand biometrics collection by the government.

Key Points:

  • The proposed regulation would expand USCIS collection of biometrics to include any applicant, regardless of age, including U.S. citizen sponsors; more types of biometrics, including palm prints, iris images and voice recognition, and, in some cases, DNA; more frequent biometrics collection, including continuous screening until an applicant becomes a naturalized U.S. citizen. Biometrics collected by USCIS would be shared with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
  • The agency will accept public comments on the proposal and will be required to review and consider those comments before releasing a final version of a regulation, which could differ from the proposed version.
  • The comment period is now open. Comments on the proposed regulation must be received by Oct. 13 and comments regarding the impact on USCIS forms must be received by Nov. 10. Comments may be submitted through the eRulemaking Portal or through alternate methods described in the Federal Register notice.

BAL Analysis: Current rules regarding biometrics collection will remain in place until a final regulation is issued, which will specify an implementation date. Because the proposed regulation raises privacy concerns, the agency is likely to receive a high volume of comments during the notice-and-comment period, and the regulation could be challenged in the courts. BAL is following these developments and will report new information as the regulation moves through the rulemaking process.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has extended certain flexible Form I-9 procedures for employers operating remotely because of the COVID-19 national emergency.

Key Points:

  • The temporary measures have been extended for an additional 60 days and are now set to expire Nov. 19.
  • The guidance allows employers who are operating 100% remotely to conduct verification of employee documents virtually, e.g., using fax, email or video link, for the purpose of Form I-9 employment eligibility verification procedures.
  • Employers that follow the virtual procedures must comply with guidelines when “normal operations resume,” including conducting physical inspection of the documents that were viewed remotely within three business days.
  • Employers should refer to the original guidance, including eligibility requirements.
  • Under the original guidance, employers that were served notices of inspection (NOIs) in March but had not yet responded were granted an automatic extension of 60 days. After July 19, no additional extensions are being granted to employers served NOIs in March.

Background: ICE introduced the temporary measures on March 20 and has extended them a number of times since then.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted the government’s request to pause a preliminary injunction that blocked the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from enforcing its public charge rule. The ruling clears the way for the agency to resume implementation of the public charge rule while the lawsuits work their way through the courts.

Key Points:

  • On July 29, U.S. District Court Judge George B. Daniels issued a nationwide injunction, blocking DHS from enforcing the public charge rule during the COVID-19 national emergency. DHS announced that it would halt application of the new public charge regulation, and apply the old rules, in compliance with the injunction.
  • The Second Circuit later narrowed the injunction’s scope to Connecticut, New York, and Vermont, clearing the way for DHS to implement it in the rest of the country. At that time, the government did not issue updated guidance in response to the narrowed injunction, but asked the Second Circuit to pause the injunction, arguing that the District Court lacked jurisdiction. In its ruling on Friday, the Second Circuit agreed.
  • DHS is expected to issue updated guidance in response to this ruling in the coming days.

Additional Information: The ruling does not affect the injunction on the State Department’s version of the public charge rule. The State Department announced in August that it would not require applicants to submit forms required by its new public charge regulations so long as the injunction remains in place.

BAL Analysis: DHS has not yet responded to the ruling, but is expected to announce that it will resume nationwide enforcement of the new public charge rule. This lawsuit and multiple other lawsuits challenging the regulation continue to progress through the courts. BAL is closely following the litigation and will provide information on significant developments as it becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf has extended the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designation for South Sudan for 18 months, from Nov. 2, 2020 to May 2, 2022.

Key points:

  • TPS for South Sudan is now extended through May 2, 2022.
  • U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is expected to update information on re-registration on its TPS webpage soon.
  • Individuals seeking to reregister should wait for official re-registration dates and instructions to be published before they submit any forms.

Background: South Sudan was originally designated for TPS on Nov. 3, 2011 owing to armed conflict, and has been redesignated several times, in 2014, 2016, 2017 and again in April 2019 through Nov. 2, 2020.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced it is extending certain flexible measures for petitioners and applicants.

Key Points:

  • Petitioners and applicants have an additional 60 days beyond the due date to respond to certain requests and notices issued by USCIS.
  • The deadline extension applies to the following documents with an issuance date between March 1 and Jan. 1, 2021.
    • Requests for Evidence.
    • Continuations to Request Evidence (N-14).
    • Notices of Intent to Deny.
    • Notices of Intent to Revoke.
    • Filing date requirements for Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion.
    • Filing date requirements for Form N-336, Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings.
    • Motions to Reopen a Naturalization Application (N-400) pursuant to receipt of derogatory information after naturalization was granted.
    • Notices of Intent to Rescind and Notices of Intent to Terminate regional investment centers.
  • USCIS will consider responses received within 60 days after the due date in the notice before it takes action on the case.

Additional Information: The agency first introduced the temporary measures on March 30 because of COVID-19, and extended them in May and again in July.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is poised to lift a requirement that flights arriving from countries that are considered high risk for COVID-19 land at one of 15 U.S. airports.

Key Points:

  • Beginning on Monday, Sept. 14, flights arriving from Brazil, China, Iran, Ireland, the United Kingdom and any of the 26 Schengen Area countries will not be required to land at one of the 15 airports. This will save some travelers time because they will be able to head directly to their destination.
  • This change does not affect entry bans on individuals who have been physically present in any of the countries in the past 14 days. These restrictions remain in place at this time, which means the lifting of airport restrictions will only affect those who are exempt from the bans.
  • Among those who are exempt from the physical presence based restrictions are: U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, foreign national spouses of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents, certain family members of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents, foreign nationals whose entry is in the U.S. national interest and a limited number of others.

Additional Information: The rule to lift the airport restrictions is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register next week.

BAL Analysis: While the change will ease travel procedures for some, it is important to note that the physical presence bans imposed by the administration remain in place at this time, and only those who are exempt from the bans can travel to the U.S. from the countries listed above. These restrictions do not have a set expiration date and will remain in effect until the president lifts them. In the past, restrictions have been expanded to additional countries with little notice, and there continue to be risks associated with international travel. BAL encourages those who are considering international travel to consult with their employer and BAL professional for an individual assessment.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) re-opened most Trusted Traveler enrollment centers Sept. 8. The enrollment centers had been closed since March 19 due to COVID-19.

Key points:

  • Global Entry applicants who have been conditionally approved may now complete in-person interviews at most Trusted Traveler enrollment centers in the U.S. but must schedule their interviews in advance by logging into their account at https://ttp.dhs.gov.
  • In accordance with the ban on nonessential travel across U.S. land borders, NEXUS and U.S.-Canada FAST interviews at U.S. and Canadian enrollment centers remain suspended and SENTRI and FAST-South enrollments on the southern border may also be limited. Crossing a U.S. land border for the purpose of visiting a Trusted Traveler Programs enrollment center is considered non-essential travel by CBP.
  • Applicants visiting enrollment centers must wear face masks and should anticipate staggered and limited interview availability, limited waiting room space and changes to sign-in measures.

BAL Analysis: Although Trusted Traveler enrollment has resumed, travelers are encouraged to consult with their employer and BAL professional for an individual assessment before planning any international travel. In addition to company policies that may limit travel, multiple travel bans remain in place for foreign nationals entering or returning to the U.S. These include entry bans on individuals who are physically present in Brazil, China, Iran, Ireland, the United Kingdom, or any country in the Schengen region within 14 days of attempting to enter the U.S.; bans on certain immigrants and nonimmigrant work-visa categories; and a ban on nonessential travel across U.S. land borders. Additionally, depending on COVID-19 developments in individual countries, new countries may be added to the physical presence ban with little notice, which could leave travelers stranded abroad.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

The Labor Department has posted updated processing times for permanent labor certification (PERM) applications and prevailing wage determination (PWD) requests.

PERM Processing: As Aug. 31, the department was adjudicating applications filed in April and earlier, conducting audit reviews on applications filed in November and earlier, and reviewing appeals for reconsideration filed in June and earlier.

Average PERM processing times in August:

  • Adjudication – 140 days.
  • Audit review – 308 days.

PWD Processing: As of Aug. 31, the National Prevailing Wage Center was processing PWD requests filed in May and earlier for H-1B cases and March and earlier for PERM cases, according to the Labor Department. Redeterminations were being considered on appeals filed in August and earlier for H-1B cases and for PERM cases. There were no center director reviews pending for H-1B or PERM cases.

Average times for issuance of prevailing wage determinations in August:

  • H-1B – 108 days (OES), 96 days (non-OES).
  • PERM – 107 days (OES), 91 days (non-OES).

The Labor Department reports PERM and PWD processing time frames on its Foreign Labor Application Gateway website.

BAL Analysis: BAL’s internal case tracking is consistent with the Labor Department’s published processing times. BAL is seeing approvals for non-audited PERM applications filed in April and earlier, and is seeing PWDs for requests filed in May and earlier for H-1B and PERM (OES) cases.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.