U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) posted guidance today on its website in response to a court order on Tuesday that blocked the agency from implementing a fee regulation. The regulation would increase filing fees and introduce revised forms, and was scheduled to take effect tomorrow.

Key points:

  • While the injunction is in place, USCIS will accept fees under the current rate schedule and forms with the current editions.
  • The agency will adjudicate petitions and applications using regulations and guidance currently in place.

Background: USCIS issued the fee regulation in August, and a lawsuit was filed the same month challenging the regulation. On Tuesday, a judge issued a nationwide preliminary injunction blocking USCIS from implementing the regulation while litigation continues.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

A continuing appropriations bill signed into law last night that will fund the federal government through Dec. 11 makes changes to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) premium processing service. The legislation requires the agency to increase premium processing fees and expand the service to other benefit categories. Premium processing is an expedited service that certain filers may request by paying an additional fee. These provisions aim to increase revenue for USCIS, which is experiencing a budget shortfall.

Key provisions:

  • The premium processing fee will increase from $1,440 to $2,500 for categories that are currently designated for the service ($1,500 for H-2B and R-1 petitions). The legislation does not change the 15-day time frame for adjudication.
  • The legislation still allows USCIS to suspend premium processing, but “only if circumstances prevent the completion of processing of a significant number of such requests within the required period.”
  • The legislation requires USCIS to expand premium processing to nonimmigrant work visa petitions and associated dependent applications; EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 immigrant petitions; applications to change or extend nonimmigrant status; and employment authorization document applications.
  • USCIS may establish premium processing for these named categories without going through the regulatory process if it meets certain fee and timeframe requirements outlined in the legislation. If the agency cannot meet those requirements, it must go through formal rulemaking.
  • USCIS may also extend premium processing to other categories not named in the legislation through the regulatory process.

Additional provisions:

  • The premium processing clock would start only when USCIS receives all required materials for adjudication.
  • Premium processing fees may be adjusted for inflation every other year without rulemaking.
  • The Secretary of Homeland Security must report to Congress within 180 days with a five-year plan that includes electronic filing for all application types, electronic payment at all locations, electronic issuance of decisions and requests, and improvement of all processing times.

BAL Analysis: Although the appropriations law takes effect immediately, USCIS is expected to provide guidance regarding the increases in the premium processing fee. Expansion of premium processing to other benefit categories will not happen immediately, and the agency’s next steps toward implementing those requirements are not yet known. BAL continues to monitor the agency’s response to the legislation and will provide updates as more information becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

 

The Labor Department’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) has announced it will permanently adopt a recent policy of issuing PERM labor certification documents electronically.

Key points:

  • Under the now-permanent process, the agency will email approved labor certifications (certified ETA Form 9089 and final determination letter) to employers and their authorized attorneys or agents.
  • Before filing the USCIS immigrant petition (Form I-140), the employer, foreign worker and preparer (if applicable) must print out the emailed ETA Form 9089 and sign and date it.
  • For those who are unable to receive emailed documents, the agency will continue to mail paper approvals.

Background: The OFLC initially introduced the electronic issuance policy on March 24 because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and extended the temporary policy once before making it permanent.

BAL Analysis: The permanent shift to electronic PERM issuance is welcome news for employers. Employers are reminded to safe list plc.atlanta@dol.gov to ensure receipt of electronic PERM documents. A July 30 inter-agency memorandum of agreement allows the Department of Homeland Security to access all PERM applications submitted to the Department of Labor through the online system, providing greater government oversight of employer compliance with wage and other labor certification requirements.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

A federal judge in California issued a nationwide injunction Tuesday, blocking U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) from implementing a rule to significantly increase immigration filing fees. The rule had been set to take effect Friday, Oct. 2.

Key Points:

  • Judge Jeffrey White ruled that the plaintiffs in the case had shown they met all of the criteria for injunctive relief, including showing that they are likely to succeed on claims that two Acting DHS officials were improperly appointed and that the issuance of the rule violated the Administrative Procedure Act.
  • Current filing fees will remain in effect until the injunction is lifted.

Background: USCIS published the final version of the rule in August. Later that month, the American Immigration Lawyers Association and several nonprofit organizations filed suit to block the regulation from taking effect. Judge White did not rule on the merits of the case, but issued the injunction to stop the rule from taking effect while litigation continues.

BAL Analysis: The fee rule will not take effect while the injunction is in place. BAL continues to follow the litigation and will alert clients to important developments.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

A federal appeals court recently overturned an injunction that since Oct. 2018 has blocked the Trump administration from terminating the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program for El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan. The case, Ramos v. Wolf, affects more than 400,000 TPS holders.

Key points:

  • The 2-1 ruling by a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit does not immediately terminate Temporary Protected Status for the four countries.
  • Last year, the Department of Homeland Security set out a framework providing a wind down period of 120 days for Haiti, Nicaragua and Sudan, and a 365-day period for El Salvador if the court overturned the injunction. However, the court’s ruling does not automatically trigger the winding down, and DHS will announce if either period begins.
  • The TPS beneficiaries who brought the lawsuit are expected to appeal to the full en banc court.
  • TPS for two other countries, Honduras and Nepal, is also implicated by decisions in the Ramos case, because of an agreement linking Ramos with another case that raises similar issues, Bhattarai v. Wolf.

Background: The court heard an appeal in a case in which a U.S. District Court in California issued a preliminary injunction in 2018 preventing DHS from terminating TPS for the four countries while the lawsuit proceeds. The Ninth Circuit vacated the injunction and ruled that the decision to terminate TPS was not reviewable by the courts. A separate injunction that blocks DHS from terminating TPS for Haiti is on appeal with another federal appeals court whose ruling is pending.

BAL Analysis: The decision does not immediately affect TPS designations for the four countries, which DHS had extended until Jan. 4, 2021. For information on the status of TPS for specific countries in light of the litigation, USCIS has a TPS page on its website.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has announced that in October it will follow the State Department’s Dates for Filing chart, as published in the October Visa Bulletin, to determine whether applicants are eligible to file for adjustment of status.

Dates for Filing for Employment-Based Preference Cases:

Preference All Other Countries China El Salvador Guatemala Honduras India Mexico Philippines
EB-1 Current Sept. 1, 2020 Current Sept. 1, 2020 Current Current
EB-2 Current Oct. 1, 2016 Current May 15, 2011 Current Current
EB-3 Current June 1, 2018 Current Jan. 1, 2015 Current Current

USCIS will also use Dates for Filing for family-based applicants, except for F2A category applicants, who may use Final Action Dates.

BAL Analysis: The use of Dates for Filing is good news for a number of employment-based immigrants, as the Dates for Filing chart contains more progressive cutoff dates than the Final Action Dates chart. Because Vietnam is not included on the Dates for Filing chart, adjustment of status applicants from Vietnam should use the dates listed under “all other countries.”

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Priority-date cutoffs will advance in most employment-based categories next month, according to the State Department’s October Visa Bulletin, which was released Thursday. The October bulletin is the first for the new fiscal year.

Key Movements in Final Action Dates:

EB-1

  • China EB-1 and India EB- 1 will advance three months to June 1, 2018.
  • All other countries under EB-1 will remain current.

EB-2

  • China EB-2 will advance 1½ months to March 1, 2016.
  • India EB-2 will advance almost two months to Sept. 1, 2009.
  • All other countries under EB-2 will remain current.

EB-3

  • China EB-3 will advance 4½ months to July 1, 2017.
  • India EB-3 will advance 3½ months Jan. 15, 2010.
  • The cutoff for all other countries will become current after having a date cutoff of April 1, 2019, in the September Visa Bulletin.

Final Action Dates for Employment-Based Preference Cases:

Preference All Other Countries China El Salvador Guatemala Honduras India Mexico Philippines Vietnam
EB-1 Current June 1, 2018 Current June 1, 2018 Current Current Current
EB-2 Current March 1, 2016 Current Sept. 1, 2009 Current Current Current
EB-3 Current July 1, 2017 Current Jan. 15, 2010 Current Current Current

The State Department also released its Dates for Filing chart for October. Applicants seeking to file for adjustment of status are reminded that the chart does not take effect unless U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services confirms that it does via a web posting after the Visa Bulletin is released. BAL will update clients once officials confirm whether the chart can be used.

Dates for Filing for Employment-Based Preference Cases:

Preference All Other Countries China El Salvador Guatemala Honduras India Mexico Philippines
EB-1 Current Sept. 1, 2020 Current Sept. 1, 2020 Current Current
EB-2 Current Oct. 1, 2016 Current May 15, 2011 Current Current
EB-3 Current June 1, 2018 Current Jan. 1, 2015 Current Current

Additional Information: The bulletin predicted “rapid forward movement” in most employment classifications later this year. This would be expected since there were many unused numbers from this year that will roll over to the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

 

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will publish a proposed regulation tomorrow that would set maximum periods of stay for foreign students, exchange visitors, and media personnel. The agency posted a prepublication version of the proposal today. This is the first step in the formal notice-and-comment process, and a final rule would not take effect for several months.

Key Points:

  • The proposed rule is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on Sept. 25.
  • Today’s posting indicates the final rule will have a 60-day delayed effective date.
  • The agency will accept comments from the public on the proposed rule for a 30-day period ending Oct. 26, and will accept comments on changes to immigration forms for 60 days.
  • ICE is proposing to modify the period of authorized stay for international students, exchange visitors, and media personnel by eliminating the availability of “duration of status” and imposing a fixed period of admission. The proposal would establish new requirements for individuals in those visa categories to maintain and extend their status.
  • In its summary of the rule, the agency reasons that the new regulation will provide predetermined dates for F, J and I nonimmigrants to allow the Department of Homeland Security to better monitor them and evaluate whether they are maintaining their status.

BAL Analysis: Current rules on duration of status (“D/S”) for F, J, and I nonimmigrants will remain in place until a final regulation takes effect. The government will accept comments from the public until Oct. 26 on the proposed regulation, and until Nov. 25 on the form changes required by the rule. ICE must review and consider the comments before finalizing the rule, and may make changes to the rule based on comments it receives. The prepublication version indicates the final rule would have a 60-day delayed effective date. BAL continues to review the proposed rule and assess its impact on foreign nationals.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

Following an appellate court ruling, the Department of Homeland Security announced it will resume implementing the public charge rule nationwide, including in Connecticut, New York and Vermont.

Key Points:

  • U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services will resume applying the public charge rule to all applications and petitions postmarked, or electronically filed, on or after Feb. 24, 2020 (the original date that the rule was implemented).
  • For applications and petitions sent by commercial courier, such as UPS, FedEx or DHL, the date on the courier receipt will be the postmark date.

Background: The resumption of the public charge rule comes in response to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruling on Sept. 11 that stayed an injunction that previously prevented the agency from implementing the public charge rule while the lawsuits make their way through the courts.

BAL Analysis: This announcement confirms that employers and employees must continue to submit documentation required by the new public charge rule to USCIS at this time. More information about filing requirements can be found on the USCIS website. The ruling does not disturb an injunction on the State Department’s version of the public charge rule that prevents that agency from implementing the rule for visa applicants outside the U.S. BAL is continuing to monitor the multiple lawsuits challenging the public charge regulations and will provide news and analysis as additional information becomes available.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.

 

The Department of Homeland Security has extended restrictions on nonessential travel across the U.S.’s land borders with Canada and Mexico.

Key Points:

  • The restrictions have been extended through Oct. 21.
  • Only “essential travel” is permitted at all land ports of entry along the U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico borders.
  • The list of individuals permitted to engage in “essential travel” includes: U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (LPRs) returning to the U.S. and people traveling to work in the U.S. (e.g., agricultural workers), engaging in lawful cross-border trade (e.g., truck drivers transporting goods), or traveling to attend school, receive medical treatment, for public health purposes, or a limited number of other reasons.
  • The restrictions do not include air or sea travel, but do apply to passenger rail, passenger ferry travel and pleasure boat travel.

Additional Information: The nonessential travel bans were imposed March 20, initially for 30 days, and have since been extended in 30-day increments.

This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com.

Copyright © 2020 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.