Immigration News - United States Judge calls H-1B policy changes ‘very troubling’ Share this article LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter) May 10, 2019 A federal judge overseeing 60 lawsuits brought by IT consulting companies that challenge stricter H-1B policies for third-party placements called the government’s policy change “very troubling” at a hearing on Thursday. In February 2018, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a policy memorandum that imposed numerous new requirements on companies petitioning for H-1B workers who intend to work off-site. The changes primarily affect IT consulting companies that petition for H-1B visas and place the workers at client sites. A group of IT consulting companies filed dozens of lawsuits in federal court in Washington, D.C., alleging that the government evaded proper administrative rulemaking procedures, including a public notice and comment period. They argue that the changes have led to lengthy processing delays, shorter durations for approved H-1B visas than the permissible three-year period, and a huge increase in denials, effectively putting the IT consulting industry out of business. They are asking the judge to strike down the new policy. During oral arguments, U.S. District Court Judge Rosemary M. Collyer expressed skepticism regarding the government’s argument that the change merely re-interpreted existing policy. She pressed the government lawyer on why the policy has led to a sharp rise in denials and chastised him for not being able to explain why the agency is taking up to one year to adjudicate these H-1B petitions instead of 30 days. H-1B denial rates for IT consulting companies have soared to up to 40%. The judge ordered additional briefing before she makes a decision. The case is ITServe Alliance v. USCIS, No. 1:18-CV-02350, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. BAL Analysis: While it is notable that the judge explicitly criticized the government’s arguments, it is too early to predict a decision, as she also noted that her decision may hinge on the Administrative Procedure Act, which could favor the government’s argument. The February 2018 policy changes for third-party H-1B placements remain in effect at this time. BAL is continuing to monitor the progress of the lawsuits. This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com. Copyright © 2019 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.
Immigration News United States | DHS issues final rule on fixed admission periods for F, J and I visas The Department of Homeland Security published a final rule in the Federal Register that establishes fixed admission periods for certain… July 17, 2026 Read More
Immigration News United States | USCIS posts July 17 update on Form I-9 guidance for Burma, Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan, Syria and Yemen TPS designations Today, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services published updates on the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations for… July 17, 2026 Read More
Immigration News United States | FY 2027 H-1B cap reached Today, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that it reached the mandated regular cap of 65,000 H-1B visas and master’s… July 17, 2026 Read More
Immigration News United States | State Department posts latest instructions for NIV and IV interview scheduling as of July 15 The State Department’s July 15 alert indicated it has “updated its instructions for all” nonimmigrant (NIV) and immigrant (IV) visa… July 17, 2026 Read More