Immigration News - United States 9th Circuit rules against Trump administration in challenge to California immigration laws Share this article LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter) April 24, 2019 The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against the Trump administration in its efforts to stop California from enforcing most of the provisions of its “sanctuary state” laws. A three-judge 9th Circuit panel ruled Friday to uphold most of a U.S. district court decision issued last summer. Key Points: The panel upheld the lower court’s ruling against enjoining a part of Assembly Bill 450 that requires employers to notify employees of any impending employment record inspections (e.g., I-9 inspections) within 72 hours of receiving notice of such an inspection. The panel declined to stop enforcement of Senate Bill 54, which limits how much information state and local law enforcement can share with federal immigration authorities and prevents local authorities from detaining individuals for the purpose of transferring them to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody. The panel ruled that the portions of Assembly Bill 103 that require state examination of the federal apprehension and transfer of immigration detainees violate the doctrine of intergovernmental immunity and, therefore, should not be enforced. Other portions of AB 103 were permitted to stand. The panel’s ruling left in place the lower court’s ruling to halt enforcement of parts of AB 450 that would have prohibited employers from allowing federal immigration enforcement agents to enter their premises without a judicial warrant. It also let stand the district court injunction against enforcing a portion of AB 450 that prohibits employers from reverifying employment eligibility of employees unless required to do so by federal law. BAL Analysis: The ruling largely reinforces the status quo, pending additional litigation. Most of the provisions of California’s sanctuary state laws that were challenged in the appeal will be allowed to stand. However, key provisions of AB 450 remain enjoined. BAL will continue following the litigation as it moves through the court system and will alert clients to any significant changes. This alert has been provided by the BAL U.S. Practice group. For additional information, please contact berryapplemanleiden@bal.com. Copyright © 2019 Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. All rights reserved. Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is permitted only with the express written permission of Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP. For inquiries please contact copyright@bal.com.
Immigration News United States | USCIS issues guidance on H-2A eligibility for dairy operations The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has released updated policy guidance… June 24, 2026 Read More
Immigration News United States | Global visa wait times as of June 18 The State Department updated global visa wait times on June 18, 2026. The average wait times reported do not guarantee… June 24, 2026 Read More
Immigration News United States | July 2026 Visa Bulletin: Most employment-based categories advance, with exceptions for India’s Final Action Dates The U.S. State Department has released the July 2026 Visa Bulletin. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced filings for… June 18, 2026 Read More
Immigration News United States | Federal court temporarily pauses ruling against $100,000 H-1B visa fee After ruling on June 8, 2026, that implementation of the H-1B Proclamation was unlawful and effectively blocking its $100,000 petition… June 15, 2026 Read More